As Rachael Jefferson-Buchanan has pointed out just some days ago in her The Conversation article ‘Uniform discontent: how women athletes are taking control of their sporting outfits’ , we can’t fully understand the contemporay advances in Women’s Sports without looking at history. During the Summer Olympic Games in Tokyo, we’ve seen the German National Gymnastics Team wearing full-body suits; and it was only days before, as Jefferson-Buchanan writes –
The Norwegian women’s beach handball team was fined for “improper clothing” during the European Championships in Bulgaria. This was because they were playing in shorts, as opposed to the required skimpy bikini bottoms, which should be “a close fit and cut on an upward angle toward the top of the leg” and have a maximum side width of 10cm, according to the 2014 International Handball Federation regulations
Praising the fact that ‘slowly, female athletes are pushing back on outdated uniform regulations and demanding that athleticism be prioritised over aesthetics’, Jefferson-Buchanan underlines how much recent this ‘rebellion in the ranks’ is. In fact, ‘where now the emphasis seems to be on revealing women’s bodies, the opposite was once the case’.
As an (Italian) scholar of Italian Sports History, I totally agree with Jefferson-Buchanan when she writes that the current sportswomen are willing ‘to oppose dress codes that are based on archaic ideas of what women should look like, often through the eyes of men’: a little journey through 1930’s Fascist Italy could be a good case study to understand how much, in 20th-century Western societies, ‘women’s sporting performances have been historically hampered and sexualised’.
Accepting the year 1925 as the conventional beginning of the Fascist regime, we can look back to understand what was going in Italy, and what might have happened if Mussolini hadn’t take control of the Italian society. In the early Twenties the first national athletics meetings and basketball championships gave some women in the most industrialized city of Northern Italy the chance to participate in sport in a similar way to how their European peers had done so since before the First World War. The very conservative Catholic Italian society wasn’t ready at all for what historian Sergio Giuntini called ‘the body’s revolution’: except for a few open-minded exceptions, no father generally was accustomed to allowing his daughters to take part in sports, and to display their bodies in a way that the “old” women’s sports such as tennis, golf, hiking and horse riding didn’t require them to do.
Although I use the word skirt for the title of this article, we’ll see how the question was wider than that particular item of clothing: it was about how much a respectable female could show her own body to males not within her familial sphere. That’s why we’ll talk not only about skirts (and their length), but also about other clothing such as tights or leggings and in addition we’ll see how the use of gendered clothes such as ski pants/torusers was still considered a little controversial.
Before talking about the ‘new’ women’s sport, we should say something about ice skating and skiing, the only two winter sports practiced by Italian girls during the Fascist Ventennio (1925-1943). Beginning with the ice-skaters, they seemed to have few problems. As long as they wore tights, thus hiding their bare legs, the length of their skirts were of little importance, their attire was acceptable because it was likened to a ballet tutu.
Women skiers had even more problems: the first females who dare to ski in Italy would wear long skirts but in the 1920s’ women, both single and married, started to wear pants or trousers, for very obvious reasons. Yet ski pants were deemed somewhat scandalous because not only did they show off the female form but they were also a traditional male symbol, which is why in one of the very early photos in Grazia Barcellona’s album, the young iceskater recalled the first day in her life when she had worn trousers (it was too cold, in Bardonecchia, on that day!).
While there was perhaps not a real fight or controversy against ski trousers at the time, except for the old-fashioned conservative ideals, a subtle irony in that regard was still to be found in the early Thirties, especially in the satirical newspapers …
An indirect but very powerful aid to Italian girls wanting to wear ski pants without causing any scandal came directly from the Royal Palace. In fact, the new generation of the Royal Family worn ski pants: and who would dare to accuse Her Highnesses Princess Iolanda (b. 1901), Mafalda (b. 1902) and Giovanna (b. 1907) or even the beautiful young Belgian wife of their brother Umberto, Princess Maria Josè (b. 1906), of being immoral?
We know from private photographs that when Maria José climbed Cervino in 1941 she wore trousers (see https://twitter.com/calciatrici1933/status/1417174572999352321 ), or that in the summer of 1940 her older daughter Maria Pia wore shorts just like her younger brother Vittorio Emanuele during the family holiday in the mountains (see https://twitter.com/calciatrici1933/status/1417136030310965249 ): but when such images were published by the Italian press, we could imply that they were an indirect but supportive way of allowing modern sportswear to be worn by the uncertain female subjects. After all – how could Their Highnesses be wrong?
Princess Maria José was also photographed playing tennis. Even this sport, which was the main sport among Italian women of all ages, caused a short lived controversy regarding the dress of the female players. In this particular case the controversy wasn’t born in Italy, but came from abroad, althought it did have an Italian chapter.
Until the summer of 1933 the standard tennis outfit was, not only in Italy but all around the world, long trousers for men and skirts for women.
The lovely fashion history video by the Olympic Channel refers to female tennis outfits during the Interwar period.
Then, in Summer 1933, the Italian press started reporting what was happening outside the national borders: a few male players such as Austin, Cochet, Merlin, Fischer, and Ellmer had begun to play in shorts: and this revolution spread to their female colleagues, such as Jacobs (USA) and Round and Scriven (UK). The humous sports magazine Guerin Meschino made up a sort of fictional debate about the female tennis players outfit, including Helen Wills Moody, Suzanne Lenglen and Helen Jacobs as speakers: Helen was against female wearing shorts, Jacobs for it, and Lenglen … only concerned about herself!
For Guerin Meschino the fashion revolution was reduced to a new opportunity for girls to show off their legs to the audience …
A year later, the situation in Italy was that most female players wore shorts with just a small minority still wearing skirts – Source: Il Littoriale, 26/10/1934, p. 4
Basketball and above all athletics, the two more innovative women’s sports of the early Twenties in Italy, played a big role in the fashion revolution. During those years, the outfits of the player’s slowly changed: with a more comfortable fit became the main aim. In 1921, some athletes from Northern Italy (i.e. those of Pro Patria club from Busto Arsizio, an industrial city north of Milan) started to wear puffy type shorts rather than the traditional style of athletic skirt; but they were still wearing dark tights or leggings, in order not to show their naked legs.
Gradually the skirt became shorter and tighter fitting …
What we should underline is that this fashion revolution wasn’t homogeneous, at all: as always happened in Italian social history, the change was welcomed in some more open-minded Northern cities such as Milan, Turin, Trieste, and Bologna, but still not accepted in other minor towns.
A very interesting photo, taken at the 1929 National Women’s Athletics Championship and depicting that year’s champions with manager Marina Zanetti at the centre of the group, shows how much the situation was heterogeneous, by the end of the Twenties. At the end of the sporting event, some athletes are wearing tracksuits, some dark leggings, and some shorts, of varying lengths
Article © of Marco Giani
Read Part 2 of this discussion paper HERE